Legal Opinion

Holleman v. . Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The trial court was indefinite in explaining to the jury the distinction between the relation of master and servant and that of principal and agent or factor. The former relation arises out of a contract of employment between a master or employer and a servant or employee, and usually contemplates the employer’s right both to prescribe the end and to direct the means and methods of doing the work. In a specific sense a servant is one who represents the will of the master, not only in the ultimate result of the work, but in the details by which the result is accomplished. True, the law of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Winslow Bros. v. StatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  2. Yale Jewelry Co. v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  2. State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. McGregor Co. v. HeritageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Salley v. Petrolane, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1991
  5. In re GriffinDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API