Legal Opinion

In re Piedmont Ave. East

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 28, 1894No. Nos. 9027-9028PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by J. B. Scovill, owner of property assessed for benefits • conferred by improvement of Piedmont avenue, Duluth, from an order of the District Court of St. Louis County, J. D. Ensign, J., made March 5, 1894, confirming a reassessment of such benefits.

Read the full summary

Appeal by J. B. Scovill, owner of property assessed for benefits • conferred by improvement of Piedmont avenue, Duluth, from an order of the District Court of St. Louis County, J. D. Ensign, J., made March 5, 1894, confirming a reassessment of such benefits. Appeal also by Joseph W. Reynolds, owner of property assessed for benefits conferred by improvement of West Superior street, Duluth, from an order of the same court made the same day confirming a reassessment of such benefits. On June 13,1S92, the Board of Public Works of the city of Duluth resolved to grade and improve Piedmont Avenue…

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

The questions presented by these appeals arise out of the passage (March 29, 1893) of an act of the legislature entitled “An act to authorize reassessments for local improvements by cities and to legalize certain of such assessments” (Laws 1893, ch. 206). This legislation was the result, probably, of a decision of this court —State ex rel. v. Judges of District Court, 51 Minn. 539, (53 N. W. 800, and 55 N. W. 122) — filed December 16, 1892. Under this act of 1893, the authorities of the city of Duluth took steps to reassess the property alleged to have been benefited by the improvement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. State ex rel. Shannon v. Judges of District Court of Eleventh Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. State ex rel. Merrick v. District Court of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  4. State ex rel. Spencer v. EnsignSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Alexander v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. Warren v. Street CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. Merchants National Bank v. City of East Grand ForksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. State ex rel. St. Anthony Park North Trust Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. State ex rel. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co. v. AmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API