M'Dowell v. Tyson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
IN ERROR. Writ of error to the Court of Common Pleas of Mifflin county. who cited, Wilson v. Wallace, 8 Serg. & Rawle, 54, 55. Lloyd v. Jlrbuckle, 2 Taunt. 324. Childerston v. Hammon, 9 Serg. & Raivle, 68. Lends v. Culbertson, 11 Serg. & Rawle, 48. Ex parte Quinton, 3 Ves., jr. 48. Leveck v. Shaftoe, 2 Esp. Rep. 468. 2 Seize. IV. P. 1103. And by who cited, Coope v. Eyre, 1 H. Bl. 37. Dale v. Cook, 4 Johns.
Read the full summary
IN ERROR. Writ of error to the Court of Common Pleas of Mifflin county. who cited, Wilson v. Wallace, 8 Serg. & Rawle, 54, 55. Lloyd v. Jlrbuckle, 2 Taunt. 324. Childerston v. Hammon, 9 Serg. & Raivle, 68. Lends v. Culbertson, 11 Serg. & Rawle, 48. Ex parte Quinton, 3 Ves., jr. 48. Leveck v. Shaftoe, 2 Esp. Rep. 468. 2 Seize. IV. P. 1103. And by who cited, Coope v. Eyre, 1 H. Bl. 37. Dale v. Cook, 4 Johns. Ch. R. 13. Henderson v. Lewis, 9 Serg. & Rawle, 3S3. 5 Cranch, 34, 39. ' 10 East, 41S. 1 JLtk. 100. 8 Burn. & East, 69. 1 Johns. Cas. 169. 2 Serg. & Rawle, 394.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Rogers, J.
This was an action of debt on book account by William Tyson, Nathan Tyson, and Charles M, Poor, merchants, trading under the firm of Tyson and Co:, against e7o/m M‘Dowell. The defence relied on, was an allegation of a partnership between Tyson and Co., and Byrnes and Co., in the purchase of flour in the fall of 1S16; and, that the defendant had furnished flour to those companies, as partners, to the amount of four thousand dollars, which be offers to allow and set off against the plaintiffs, to the full amount of their debt and damages. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cramond v. President of the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1803
3Cited by1 opinion
- Swoyer's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847