Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Kyle

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1957PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swepston

This phase of the above-styled case is before us on writ of certiorari.

This opinion deals only' with the question whether Hallie K. Biner should have been allowed to intervene in the principal case.

That case was commenced by Katherine Gr. Barnes filing her original hill for the purpose of removing as a cloud upon her title the claim of the City of Elizabethton under various and sundry conveyances. She based her claim to some 200 lots located in the City of Elizabethton on a tax deed she had obtained from the State.

The city filed an answer and cross-bill- against Mrs. Barnes and her husband,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Co. v. IckesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Cason v. BaskinSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  3. Leland v. LelandIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Hulett v. HulettMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
  5. State Board of Medical Examiners v. FriedmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Michelle RYE Et Al. v. WOMEN’S CARE CENTER OF MEMPHIS, MPLLC Et Al.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Kochins v. Linden-Alimak, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  3. Church v. PeralesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  4. Harrison v. SchraderTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Jennifer Kay Brumit Mathis and Her Husband, Barry L. Mathis, Plaintiffs v. Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API