Legal Opinion

Pacific Gas and Electric Company v. the United States 07-157c and

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 2, 2013No. Case 07-157C and 07-167CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion to Reconsider; City of Redding v. FERC, 693 F.3d 828 (9th Cir.2012) Bonneville Power Administration v. FERC, 422 F.3d 908 (9th Cir.2005)

OPINION AND ORDER

Smith, Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Reconsider this Court’s Opinion and Order dated May 2, 2012. Plaintiffs have not responded directly to this Motion nor has the Court requested a response to this particular Motion. However, Defendant has raised the same arguments in prior motions before this Court to which the Plaintiffs have responded. The parties wei’e heard on those on September 7, 2012. Additionally,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bonneville Power Administration v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. City of Redding v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Alliant Energy v. Nebraska Public Power DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People of the State of California Ex Rel. Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General of the State of California v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Pacific Gas and Electric Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. People of the State of California Ex Rel. Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General of the State of California v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API