Dunlop Tire & Rubber Co. v. White
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. Where a person in possession and claiming ownership of goods ships them to another person under an agreement for their exchange for other goods desired by the consignor, the consignee can not dispute the title of the consignor without first restoring the status, and if he refuses to redeliver the goods or to send others in exchange according to agreement, the consignor can maintain an action of trover against the consignee to recover the goods shipped or their value.
*269Decided May 11, 1932. Eay & Forester, V. L. Powers, for plaintiff in error. Titus & Delete, contra.
2. In such a case the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pitcher & Manda v. LoweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Haralson County v. GoldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Gaskins v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Loveless v. BridgesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- McGowan-Motes Motor Co. v. WhatleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926