Legal Opinion

People v. Davenport

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 1, 2007No. B194281PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KRIEGLER, J.

Following his 2004 narcotics possession conviction, defendant was placed on probation conditioned on his participation and completion of an appropriate drug treatment program, pursuant to Proposition 36, the Substance Abuse Crime Prevention Act of 2000 (Pen. Code, §§ 1210-1210.5). Defendant’s probation was later revoked. The trial court imposed a two-year prison term, but refused to credit defendant for the 88 days he spent in a residential drug treatment program as part of his Proposition 36 sentence. The trial court ruled as a matter of law that time spent in a drug…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. AmbroseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. People v. DarnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. People v. JeffreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. People v. BowenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. BillyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  2. People v. Jackson CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. The People v. Dabney CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API