Legal Opinion

Aucoin v. City of Mandeville

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1989No. 88 CA 1326PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATKINS, Judge.

This is an appeal by the defendant City of Mandeville and by intervenors, Ken and Totsy G. Brownson. The appellants complain of a district court judgment in favor of plaintiff Milton Aucoin, which judgment reversed a classification by the Mandeville Zoning Board of a commercial laundry business owned by intervenors as a permissible use in a B-2 district.

FACTS

The appellee Mr. Aucoin concurs in the “Statement of the Case” set forth in the brief of appellant City of Mandeville. We quote the pertinent parts:

This dispute centers around the operation of a commercial laundry by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Greenup v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. KAPLAN TELEPHONE v. City of Kaplan Bd. of AdjustmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Paul J. Burroughs, Kenneth Burroughs, Terri Spinner, David Spinner, Sean Harvey, And Ty Harvey v. The City Of Davenport Zoning Board Of Adjustment, The City Of Davenport, Iowa, An Iowa Municipal Corporation, And MZ Annie-Ru Daycare Center, An Iowa Limited Liability CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  2. Pace v. Parish of JeffersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Livingston Suites, LLC v. City of Mandeville Planning and Zoning Commission and City of MandevilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2023
  4. Paul J. Burroughs, Kenneth Burroughs, Terri Spinner, David Spinner, Sean Harvey, And Ty Harvey v. The City Of Davenport Zoning Board Of Adjustment, The City Of Davenport, Iowa, An Iowa Municipal Corporation, And MZ Annie-Ru Daycare Center, An Iowa Limited Liability CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API