Legal Opinion

Coughlin v. Morell

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 29, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

SKILLMAN, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs Charles and Frances Coughlin filed this automobile negligence action against defendants Morell and Pfeiffer. Charles’ claim was for his personal injuries suffered in the accident and Frances’ claim was for the loss of her husband’s services and consortium. As required by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-25a and R. 4:21A-1, plaintiffs’ claims were submitted to arbitration. The arbitrators found Morell 100 percent negligent and awarded damages of $4,000. Morell rejected the arbitration award and demanded a trial de novo.

The case was tried before…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ekalo v. Constructive Service Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Ackerman v. Kramer Chemical CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  3. Boyd v. SteeleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wiese v. DedhiaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  2. Williams v. Shop Rite of Lacey TownshipNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API