Mattox v. State

OPINION

STEWART, Judge.

Richard A. Mattox was convicted of felony refusal to submit to a chemical test. 1 He asks this court to reverse his conviction, arguing that there was insufficient evidence that he understood he was required to submit to a breath test to support his conviction for refusal. Having reviewed the record, we conclude there was enough evidence for a fair-minded juror to find that Mattox knew or should have known of his legal duty to submit to a breath test.

Mattox also argues that his right to due process was violated in two ways: first, because the officer who arrested him for…