Legal Opinion

United States v. Escobar

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 13, 1992No. 91-1285(JBW)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEINSTEIN, District Judge.

Defendant’s motion to select another judge to try this case is granted. Although a motion to recuse would have had to be denied and the federal judiciary has declined to recognize the defendant’s general right to peremptorily challenge a judge in any case, the special nature of a capital case argues that such a right be afforded where death is a possible penalty. Alternatively, defendant is entitled to have a new judge assigned pursuant to the Guidelines for Division of Business of the United States- District Court for the Eastern District of New…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. HaleNew York Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Bilello v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
  3. United States v. El-JassemDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
  4. Ukrainian National Ass'n of Jewish Former Prisoners of Concentration Camps & Ghettos v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
  5. United States v. SchwambornDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API