Legal Opinion
Dado v. Jeeninga
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 24, 2001No. 45A03-0004-CV-129Published
1Opinion of the Court
743 N.E.2d 291 (2001)
Laura DADO, Appellant-Defendant,
v.
Sidney JEENINGA and Wendy Jeeninga, Appellees-Plaintiffs.
No. 45A03-0004-CV-129.
Court of Appeals of Indiana.
January 24, 2001.
Ray L. Szarmach, Szarmach & Fernandez, Merrillville, IN, Attorney for Appellant.
OPINION
BAILEY, Judge.
Case Summary
Laura Dado ("Laura") appeals the judgment entered by a small claims court in favor of Sidney and Wendy Jeeninga in the amount of $1,650. We affirm.
Issue(s)
Laura presents two issues, which we restate as:
I. Is there evidence in the record supporting the small claims court's determination that Laura was at…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pasadena State Bank v. IsaacTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- City of Dunkirk Water & Sewage Dept. v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Gass v. Agate Ice Cream, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Pitman v. PitmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.