Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 14, 1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Samuel Hoyt Hubbard and Gary Robert Reach were both indicted for the offense of trafficking in cannabis, in violation of § 20-2-80, Code of Alabama 1975. The jury found the appellants "guilty as charged in the indictment." A sentencing hearing was held, at which the trial judge granted a defense motion for judgment of acquittal as to the trafficking conviction. He then found the appellants guilty of possession of cannabis, in violation of § 20-2-70, Code of Alabama 1975. Samuel Hoyt Hubbard was sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment in the penitentiary. Gary Robert Reach received a suspended…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bernard Austin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. Ex Parte EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Dickerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Reeves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. United States v. James CobbCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. J.F.C. v. City of DaphneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  2. Ex Parte HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  5. Seales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API