Legal Opinion

Barasch v. Bell Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1992No. 201 E.D. 1990, 202 E.D. 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

529 Pa. 523 (1992)

605 A.2d 1198

David M. BARASCH, Consumer Advocate, et al., Appellees,

v.

The BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellant.

David M. BARASCH, Consumer Advocate, et al., Appellees,

v.

PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued October 24, 1991.

Decided March 18, 1992.

James G. Pachulski, Julia A. Conover, Daniel E. Monagle, Irving R. Segal, Gerard J. St. John, D. Michael Stroud, Philadelphia, and John Levin, Harrisburg, for appellants.

Susan Borden Evans, Philadelphia, amicus curiae, for N.O.A.D.

Robert A. Preate, Scranton, amicus curiae,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ballou v. State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Barasch v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API