Legal Opinion

Sheffield v. Ervin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1951No. 33697PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

Defendant in error contends that even though plaintiff below filed an amendment within the 20 days allowed, if the amendment does not cure the defects pointed out by the demurrer, the dismissal of the action relates back to the date of the signing of the order sustaining the demurrer and giving leave to amend, that is, January 17, 1951, and that such date was more than 20 days before the tender of the bill of exceptions and that therefore the bill was not tendered in time, and further contends that no error is assigned upon the “final and determinative order” of January 17, but only upon a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. BuggCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  2. Speer v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  3. Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  4. Smith v. Atlanta Gas-Light Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. Luke v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ervin v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  2. OCMULGEE ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION v. Taylor & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Pittman v. Presley Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API