Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Rice

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 3, 1886PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Action by the plaintiffs, as a part of the heirs at law of William Johnson, deceased, against the trustee under his will and the beneficiaries under the trust, for an adjudication as to the validity of certain provisions of the will; brought to the Superior Court. Facts found and case reserved for advice. The ease is fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

William Johnson made his will in 1863.-He died in 1874. In his will he gave the greater portion of his estate to trustees in fee simple, who were directed to pay over the income, after paying a certain annuity, in equal portions to his two daughters during their joint lives; and on the death of either to pay over one half the income to the other during life, and from the other half to pay to each of the children of the deceased daughter the sum of $200 annually, the balance to be added to the principal. The fifth article of the trust clause of the will is as follows:—

“ At the decease of my…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ansonia National Bank's Appeal from CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Bartlett v. SearsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  3. Colonial Trust Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  4. Belfield v. BoothSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  5. Russell v. HartleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API