Legal Opinion

Huval v. Sexton Corp.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1932No. 936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMouton, J.

On the first trial of this case, a compensation suit, the court rendered judgment against defendant for partial disability, and, on the second, granted on a motion for a rehearing; plaintiff was allowed compensation for total disability which is claimed in his petition.

Plaintiff, at the time he was hurt, was employed in laying gas pipe lines for defend-, ant company.

He. Says he had gotten down in a ditch where the pipes were being laid, and, when injured, was standing in water which covered his boots. He testifies that he was digging in the ditch with a shovel; that, as he tried to get out of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bronson v. Harris Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Connell v. Gilliland Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Hutchinson v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Elix v. Glassell-Wilson Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Rutley v. Honor & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sunny Point Packing Co. v. FaighCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  2. Durrett v. Unemployment Relief CommitteeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Johnson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Hall v. Mengel Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Williams v. Jahncke Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API