Supervalu, Inc. v. Wexford Underwriting Managers, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHMLANN-GERST, J.
The issue presented is the interpretation of the word “occurrence” in the excess workers’ compensation policies provided to appellant Supervalu, Inc., doing business as Albertson’s, Inc. (Supervalu), by respondents TIG Insurance Company (TIG), Continental Casualty Company (Continental) and Wexford Underwriting Managers, Inc. (Wexford) (collectively respondents). The trial court concluded that Supervalu was required to pay a self-insured retention every time an employee sustained injury due to an accident or occupational disease. It granted summary adjudication in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Winet v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Reyes v. KoshaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Guthrey v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Trishan Air, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Hervey v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Advanced Network, Inc. v. Peerless InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Lewis v. City of BeniciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Komorsky v. Farmers Ins. Exch., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.