Legal Opinion

United States v. Work Wear Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1979No. 77-3140, 78-3482PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Circuit Judge.

This case presents the question whether the district court * abused its discretion in refusing to reduce by half a civil contempt fine of over $1 million. Since we are unable to find an abuse of discretion on the record before us, we affirm.

I

In June of 1968, the Anti-Trust division of the Justice Department filed suit against defendant Work Wear Corporation, alleging that defendant’s acquisition of a number of industrial laundries violated section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18. After extensive negotiations, the parties agreed upon a consent settlement of the case.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Miriam Morrison Peake v. The First National Bank and Trust Company of MarquetteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  2. Brown v. NeebCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Blevins Popcorn Company, American Federation of Grain Millers, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  4. New York State Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc. v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. CridenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API