Appleman v. Michael
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County. The nature of this case, and the pleadings and facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County. The nature of this case, and the pleadings and facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court. Exception. — At the trial the plaintiffs offered the three following prayers: 1. That if the jury believe from the evidence that the goods spoken of by the witnesses, in the store of Eales, were sold to the plaintiffs, in consideration of a debt due by Pales to the plaintiffs, and of a debt due by Pales to' Griffith & Co., which the plaintiffs were authorized to settle, and the latter, through one of the members of the firm, had control…
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
The declaration in this case contains the common counts for goods sold and delivered, and two special counts to the effect, that one Fales being indebted to the plaintiffs in a certain sum of money, sold and delivered to them all his stock of dry-goods in his store in Hagerstown, which goods the plaintiffs took possession of and were about to remove to Baltimore, but before they were removed the plaintiffs at the request of the defendant sold and delivered to him, so many of said goods as Fales should say were saleable in the Hagerstown market, at. such price or valuation as should be agreed…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Phelps v. HerroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Alexander v. Capital Paint Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
- Farmers Phosphate Co. v. GillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
- Korzendorfer Realty, Inc. v. BufaloCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Gambrill v. SchooleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.