Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 21, 1995No. 94-3991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

WOLF, Judge.

Appellee seeks rehearing of our decision in Brown v. State, 658 So.2d 659 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). We grant the motion in part. Appellee asserts two grounds on rehearing. We find that only one has merit. Appellant’s motion for postconviction relief fails to allege sufficient facts to establish that the convictions arose from a single criminal episode. Thompson v. State, 564 So.2d 1189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993). We, therefore, reverse our previous position as to this issue, and affirm the trial court’s denial of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. Spicer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API