Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Moiles

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Saginaw. Trespass qu. el. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Marston, C. J".

This was an action of trespass qu. cl. It appears tliat Thompson in the winter of 1879 cut a number of pine trees standing upon a certain piece of laud owned by the plaintiff, and it was admitted that the defendant acted in good faith in cutting and removing the timber.

Henry Moiles, the husband of plaintiff, was examined as a witness in her behalf. On the direct examination he gave no evidence as to the value of the timber cut or injury to the land, because he did not know the quantity or value of the timber cut and removed. On cross-examination defendant’s counsel sought to…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. Elm City Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Ayres v. HubbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Cunningham v. O'ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API