Legal Opinion
Springfield v. San Diego Unified Port District
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 20, 1996No. Civil 96-1669-BTM(CGA)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary judgment. Based on the papers, oral argument held on December 20,1996, and for the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
The San Diego International Airport (“Airport”) serves the. sixth largest city in the United States. To meet increasing demands of the traveling public, Defendant San Diego Unified Port District (“Port District”), the government entity that operates, manages, and controls the Airport, began a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sanders v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- San Diego Unified Port v. U.S. Citizens PatrolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- San Diego Unified Port Dist. v. US Citizens PatrolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Sanders v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007