Legal Opinion · Dissent

Olakunle Oshodi v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 27, 2013No. 08-71478Published

1Dissent

Chief Judge KOZINSKI, with whom Judges RAWLINSON and BYBEE join,

dissenting:

The majority today holds that aliens seeking asylum have a constitutional right “to testify fully as to the merits of their application.” Maj. op. 890. But constitutional rights, once created, are not easily cabined: If would-be immigrants have a right to testify without limitation in support of their claims, so do untold millions of citizens whose vital interests are at stake in administrative proceedings. Which is doubtless why the Supreme Court has rejected the existence of any such right. Today’s ruling is, in any…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API