Legal Opinion
Kennedy v. Automotive Maintenance Inc.
New York District Court
Decided April 13, 1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLawrence Newmark, J.
This is a small claims action for breach of warranty.
Plaintiff commenced this action to recover $75 for breach of an express used car warranty. Paragraph 3 of the warranty provides as follows: "For the warranty to remain in effect, the registered owner must have the engine oil and oil filter changed at his expense each 4,000 miles or 4 months, whichever occurs first, and the fact of such change verified at an authorized station on the forms provided in this booklet with a copy to be retained by the owner.” The plaintiff had the necessary service performed at an authorized dealer pursuant to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Van Clief v. . Van VechtenNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Spence v. . HamNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Witherell v. LaskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Schultze v. . GoodsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Amoco Tax Leasing IV Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Incorporated v. Amoco Tax Leasing Iv CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994