Legal Opinion

Brigham v. Dewald

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1893No. 921PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

‘This was an action instituted by appellees against appellant, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for labor performed and material furnished in plumbing a building erected by a contractor for appellant.

On the trial, the court made a special finding of the facts, stated conclusions of law thereon, and rendered judgment in favor of appellees for the balance due them.

The errors assigned in general term were:

First. That the complaint does not contain facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

*116Second. That the court erred in its conclusions of law on the facts found.

The affirmation of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parker v. ClaytonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Waterman v. YoungerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  3. Gantner v. KemperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Templeton v. Sam Klain & Son, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Clark v. HueyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Davis & Rankin Building & Manufacturing Co. v. ViceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Beach v. HuntsmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Plano Manufacturing Co. v. KeslerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API