Brigham v. Dewald
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
‘This was an action instituted by appellees against appellant, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for labor performed and material furnished in plumbing a building erected by a contractor for appellant.
On the trial, the court made a special finding of the facts, stated conclusions of law thereon, and rendered judgment in favor of appellees for the balance due them.
The errors assigned in general term were:
First. That the complaint does not contain facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
*116Second. That the court erred in its conclusions of law on the facts found.
The affirmation of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Parker v. ClaytonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Waterman v. YoungerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
- Gantner v. KemperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
3Cited by7 opinions
- Templeton v. Sam Klain & Son, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Clark v. HueyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Davis & Rankin Building & Manufacturing Co. v. ViceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Beach v. HuntsmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
- Plano Manufacturing Co. v. KeslerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.