Legal Opinion

Rose v. Lurton Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 13, 1933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Four mortgages' were made out in the name of W. J. Davis and E. P. Rose, partners under the firm name of Davis and Rose, and Lorena B. Davis, wife of the said W. J. Davis, and Carrie Rose, wife of the said E. P. Rose, as mortgagors, to The Lurton Company, as' mortgagee. The execution of the mortgages was accomplished by the signature and seals of the partners as follows: “Davis & Rose by E. P. Rose, Carrie Rose, W. J. Davis, Lowena B. Davis.”

The mortgages were on printed forms, designed to be filled in with written descriptions of real and personal property to be specifically described, after…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Capital City Bank v. HilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  2. Thompson v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1878
  3. Finlayson v. LipscombSupreme Court of Florida · 1876
  4. Goodrich v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  5. Davis v. HorneSupreme Court of Florida · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. International Harvest. Cr. v. American Nat. Bk.Supreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. First Texas Savings Ass'n v. Comprop Investment Properties Ltd.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1990
  3. SEC. FIRST FED. SAV & LOAN v. JarchinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Watson v. PoeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  5. Tampa Pipeline Transport Co. v. Chase Manhattan Service Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API