Legal Opinion

Riley v. McNulty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1906Published

Appeal by the defendant, Patrick H. McNulty, etc.,, from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the, city of New York in favor of the plaintiff entered after a trial by the court. ,

1Opinion of the Court

Gaynor, J..:. The plaintiff was hurt by the fal-1 of a scaffold erected by the defendant, his. employer, for the plaintiff to work on. Counsel for the defendant argues that the complaint was insufficient to-enable the plaintiff to recover for the furnishing of an unsafe scaffold, which section 18 of the Labor Law -forbids, because it did not plead the said statute and allege a violation of it. It was not’ necessary to do so. The complaint alleged thatthe scaffold was of unsafe material and also unsafely constructed, and that sufficed. That the liability of the employer is created or enlarged…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harris v. Baltimore Machine & Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API