Legal Opinion
Lacy Dodd v. Dr. Randall Hines
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Decided September 6, 2016No. 2015-CA-00334-COAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREENLEE, J.,
FOR THE COURT:
¶ 1. This is an appeal from the Rankin County Circuit Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Dr. Randall Hines (Hines), Reproductive Medicine PLLC (RM), and Dr. Paul Seago (Seago), on the basis that Hines, RM, and Seago had Lacy Dodd’s (Lacy) consent to remove both of her ovaries. The circuit court’s grant of summary judgment was based on a document signed by Lacy authorizing the removal of ovarian cyst(s), possible .removal of one fallopian tube, and. other procedures considered “necessary or emergent” to the .medical staff. We reverse and remand for further…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Karpinsky v. American National Insurance Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2013
- Phillips by and Through Phillips v. HullMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Barner v. GormanMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Karl J. Pizzalotto, MD, Ltd. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lacy Dodd v. Dr. Randall HinesMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
- Lacy Dodd v. Dr. Randall HinesMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
- Shani M. Brown v. Dr. Barbara Davey-Sullivan and The Woman's Clinic of Mississippi, PLLCMississippi Supreme Court · 2026