Legal Opinion
State Ex. Rel. Graham v. Klumpp
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 25, 1995No. C4-94-1016, C1-94-2253 and C3-94-2254PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.
This case arises from three interrelated claims that were filed in response to the Governor of Minnesota’s request pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 8.01 (1992) for the attorney general to prosecute Anthony Eklund and Todd Davis for alleged criminal sexual conduct and the Crow Wing County District Court’s simultaneous appointment pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 388.12 (1992) of the attorney general to prosecute Eklund and Davis. The court of appeals concluded that under Minn. Stat. § 8.01 the governor’s request for the attorney general to prosecute Eklund and Davis was invalid.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Elzie v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Lenz v. Coon Creek Watershed DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. ConnellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- State Ex Rel. Graham v. KlumppCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
3Cited by13 opinions
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Leonard v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. SebaskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Klein Bancorporation, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Cummings v. KoehnenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.