Legal Opinion
United States v. Dakota
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided June 28, 1985No. M84-246CA2PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND JUDGMENT
MILES, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment. On September 19, 1984 the United States and the State of Michigan brought a complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief against Frederick and Sybil Dakota and the Kewee-naw Bay Indian Community requesting that the Dakotas be enjoined from operating a commercial gambling business, that the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community (“KBIC”) be enjoined from issuing any “Commercial Gambling Licenses” to permit commercial gambling upon their federal reservation, and that the Court enter a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mashantucket Pequot Tribe v. State of Connecticut and William A. O'neill, Governor of the State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Mertis WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Bay Mills Indian CommunityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1988