Legal Opinion

Davis v. M & M Aircraft Acquisitions, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 21, 2011No. 4D11-706PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this appeal is whether appellant, a non-party to the original action, has standing under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) to challenge a final declaratory judgment allegedly procured by “fraud” or “collusion.” We find that the final judgment directly affected appellant’s rights such that he has standing to be heard on the merits of his motion.

Appellant and Daniel McCue respectively owned 40% and 60% of appellee Aerovision, LLC. When McCue sold his interest in Aerovision to appellee M & M Aircraft, Inc., appellant filed an action for declaratory relief against McCue in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pearlman v. PearlmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. State Airlines, Inc. ex rel. Struve v. MenutDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Woginiak v. KleimanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Chaluts v. NagarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gotham Insurance Co. v. MatthewDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. CINDY STUART, CLERK AND COMPTROLLER FOR 13TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API