Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Harrison, Jr.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1932No. Appeal 114PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

We are obliged to reverse the order or decree of the municipal court and dismiss the proceeding for want of jurisdiction in that court to consider it.

The proceeding !was a bill in equity filed under the Act of May 23, 1907, P. L. 227, as amended by the Acts of April 27, 1909, P. L. 182 and July 21,1913, P. L. 867, by a deserted wife for the seizure and appropriation to her maintenance of part of a trust fund created by her husband and placed with the other defendant, Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.

The Act of 1907, supra, authorizes the deserted wife to bring her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Price v. PriceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Wettengel v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Reed v. ReedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Hunnings v. HunningsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. DuPuy EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Eldredge v. EldredgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Mertz v. MertzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Grimes v. GrimesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Grimes v. GrimesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API