Legal Opinion

Davids v. Andrew Saul Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 6, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2020-3571Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KORY D.,1 Plaintiff, Case No.: 1:20-cv-3571-RMM v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI,2 Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Kory D. (“Mr. D.”) brings this action under a provision of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (the “Act”), seeking review of a decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) to deny his claim for disability insurance benefits. District Judge Christopher R. Cooper referred this matter to the undersigned for all purposes and trial upon the parties’…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Shirley HARMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. Butler, Joan S. v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  5. Florida Municipal Power Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API