Legal Opinion

LeDoux v. LeDoux

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1990No. 88-172PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant, Edward L. LeDoux, a noncustodial father, claims that the Douglas County District Court erred in entering a marriage dissolution decree that restricted religious activities between himself and his children.

In the decree, the trial court ordered LeDoux, a Jehovah’s Witness, to refrain from exposing or permitting any other person to expose his minor children to any religious practices or teachings inconsistent with the Catholic religion. The court *481further ordered that while visiting their father, the children be permitted to engage in activities normally permitted by the Catholic…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Munoz v. MunozWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Bonjour v. BonjourAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Varnum v. VarnumSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. Zummo v. ZummoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Hickenbottom v. HickenbottomNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Meyer v. MeyerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  5. Kendall v. KendallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API