Legal Opinion

Piaget v. Headley

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1900Published

Action for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtLeventritt, J.

It is not apparent that the defendants have violated any rights of the plaintiff in putting up their registering banks in trunk-shaped cases.

Conceding the very doubtful proposition of law that the plaintiff could, in this particular instance, acquire such proprietary *205rights in the mere shape of the casting (Fischer v. Blank, 138 N. Y. 244; Browne Trademarks, 89b, 137; Moorman v. Hoge, 2 Sawy. 78; Harrington v. Libby, 12 Off. Gaz. 188; 26 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, 311, and cases cited) as would entitle him to an injunction restraining the alleged unfair competition, I fail to find in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fischer v. . BlankNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Moorman v. HogeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API