Legal Opinion

In re Aretakis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Having issued an order declaring that no factual issues were raised in this matter and having heard respondent in mitigation (see 22 NYCRR 806.5), we now find respondent guilty of professional misconduct as charged and specified in the petition.

*1161As set forth in charge one, respondent engaged in frivolous conduct by making false accusations against judges, which accusations were prejudicial to the administration of justice, engaged in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness as an attorney, asserted positions which served to harass and maliciously injure, knowingly made false statements…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoatson v. New York ArchdioceseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. People v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bouchard v. New York ArchdioceseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. In re DearAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. In re YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Matter of AretakisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  5. Matter of SteinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API