Legal Opinion

Charles Whitney and Edward Russell Watson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 25, 1974No. 74-1239PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge.

The issue on this appeal is whether the district court erred in denying without a hearing appellants’ motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1970). We have carefully reviewed each of the points raised by appellants in support of this contention and affirm the lower court’s denial of relief.

Appellants Whitney and Watson, half-brothers, were found guilty by a jury in 1970 of possession of merchandise stolen while in interstate commerce, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659 (1970). They received sentences of ten and five years, respectively. On direct appeal to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Kaufman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Roger Lee McQueen v. Harold R. Swenson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  5. Chester Nelson v. People of the State of California, Robert A. Heinze, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  2. United States v. Jeffery Lewis Bulgatz, United States v. Elizabeth BulgatzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. James E. LittleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  4. Ramsey v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
  5. People v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API