Legal Opinion

Succession of Heinemann

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 27, 1931No. 30990PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOverton, J.

The object of this litigation is to annul the last will and testament of Alexander J. Heinemann.

Heinemann never married. He left no heirs in the direct ascending line. His only legal heirs were collaterals. They comprised two brothers, a sister, and the children of a pre-¡deceased sister. He left an estate, consisting ■^almost entirely of corporate stocks, worth, jroughly stated, about $240,000, above liabilities.

The efforts to annul the will are made by jthe children of the predeceased sister, who are entirely omitted from it. The will is in olographic form, is written on the letterhead of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Succession of RobertsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
  2. Godden v. Executors of BurkeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  3. Succession of McCaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  4. Succession of FordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McCarty v. TrichelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  2. Succession of BoydSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  3. Succession of VicknairLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. In Re Will of FerreeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  5. In Re Irvine's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API