Legal Opinion

People v. Freeman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1982No. Docket 61632PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

Edward James Freeman was convicted of carrying a pistol in an automobile. We hold that Freeman’s pretrial motion to suppress the pistol and quash the information should have been granted, and accordingly reverse his conviction. The record does not establish that the officers who approached Freeman’s vehicle and detained him while requesting that he produce identification and a vehicle registration — a seizure which led to discovery of the pistol — possessed objective facts justifying a reasonable, articulable suspicion that Freeman was involved in criminal activity.

I

At approximately 12:30…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. MurrayIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. BurrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Frette v. City of SpringdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. People v. ChambersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State v. SarhegyiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API