Legal Opinion

Schosek v. Amherst Paving, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 2008PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, and that part of defendant Amherst Paving, Inc.’s motion that sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it denied. A triable issue of fact exists as to whether Amherst Paving created or exacerbated a dangerous condition.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Boderick v. R.Y. Management Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Petito v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Divens v. Finger Lakes Gaming & Racing Assn., Inc., LPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. Golisano v. Keeler Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Kelley v. SchneckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API