Peterson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Commissioner.
We granted appellant the right to file a third motion for rehearing upon the allegations of the motion that the count of the indictment upon which the conviction was predicated was fatally defective.
Since the filing of the motion, there has been filed herein a supplemental transcript containing a certified copy of the indictment, which shows that the claimed defect therein did not, in fact, exist and that the indictment was incorrectly copied in the original transcript.
The indictment as it appears ⅛ the certified copy is subject to no defect.
Appellant again challenges,…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Charles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Renesto v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Ames v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Placker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.