Legal Opinion
Harrington v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 12, 2024No. 4:23-cv-06296Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MICHAEL J HARRINGTON, et al., Case No. 23-cv-06296-HSG 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 28 10 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, 11 Defendant. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s motion to 14 dismiss. Dkt. No. 28. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral 15 argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed 16 below, the Court will GRANT the motion. 17 I. BACKGROUND…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hindes v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Clyde C. Freeman and Nancy F. Freeman v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Madison National BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. CraftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Whitney F. SHARPE; Mona E. Sharpe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FDIC, Receiver for Pioneer Bank, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Friends of the Earth v. Sanderson FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.