Legal Opinion

Carey v. Me. Bd. of Overseers of the Bar

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 5, 2018No. Docket: Ken–17–419PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] Judge Maria Woodman and Judge Nancy Carlson (collectively, the judges) appeal from an order of the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Anderson, J. ) denying their motion to seal or strike portions of Seth T. Carey's response to their motion to dismiss his complaint. We dismiss the appeal because it is interlocutory and does not fall within any exception to the final judgment rule.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] The following facts are drawn from the procedural history. See Schulz v. Doeppe , 2018 ME 49, ¶ 3, 182 A.3d 1246. Carey is a lawyer and is the respondent in an attorney discipline proceeding.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
Greg Rushford, the Washington Post Company, Intervenor v. The New Yorker Magazine, Inc., and William Shawn Reneta AdlerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
Virginia Gambale v. Deutsche Bank Ag, Bankers Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Limelight Networks, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
Fiber Materials, Inc. v. SubiliaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Express Scripts Inc. et al.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023