Legal Opinion · Concurrence
People v. A.G.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 28, 2010No. D053991Published
1Concurrence
McDONALD, J., Concurring.
I take the unusual step of writing a concurring opinion even though I am the author of the majority opinion. I believe the majority opinion accurately summarizes the law and properly applies that law to the narrow issues resolved by the majority opinion, and agree the true finding that A.G. violated San Diego Municipal Code section 58.0102 must be reversed. However, I believe there is an additional and significant basis for reversing the true finding that is not addressed by the majority opinion: whether the San Diego curfew ordinance is invalid because it violates…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Attorney General of New York v. Soto-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brennan v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Madeline Johnson, Etc. v. The City of Opelousas, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.