Legal Opinion
Johnson v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided April 13, 1983No. 04-81-00206-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CANTU, Justice.
Appeals are taken from three capital murder convictions in which the jury assessed punishment in each case at life imprisonment. See Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 19.03 and Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 37.071 (Vernon 1974). The trial court ordered that each sentence be served consecutively. Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 42.08 (Vernon 1979). We affirm.
In identical briefs, appellant seeks to review thirteen instances of alleged error. The sufficiency of the evidence to support the convictions is not challenged.
Briefly stated, the record reflects that appellant and two companions,…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adams v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- MacIas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
- Snow v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
- Fee v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986
- Young v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1992
- Addison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.