Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Martin v. Russo

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 2011No. 2011-1223PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the claim of appellant, Tramaine Martin, for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael J. Russo, to vacate his sentence in a criminal case and resentence him.

{¶ 2} As the court of appeals correctly held, Martin’s claims of sentencing error, including his allied-offense claim, are not cognizable in an action for an extraordinary writ, because he has an adequate remedy by appeal to raise these claims. See State ex rel. Voleck v. Powhatan Point, 127 Ohio St.3d 299, 2010-Ohio-5679, 939…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. VoorhiesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State ex rel. Marshall v. GlavasOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State Ex Rel. Voleck v. Village of Powhatan PointOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State ex rel. Brown v. WaufordOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State ex rel. Cotton v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. State v. LiteralOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State ex rel. Koller v. SutulaOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API