Legal Opinion
Philadelphia Electric Company v. Curtis Bay Towing Company of Pennsylvania and Tugboat J. H. Deinlein, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel and Equipment v. United States of America, and American Dredging Company, Curtis Bay Towing Company of Pennsylvania (Claimant-Respondent), Margaret C. Walling, Ritner E. Walling and Richard C. Walling, Co-Partners Trading as Oliver Transportation Company v. Curtis Bay Towing Company of Pennsylvania and Tugboat J. H. Deinlein, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel and Equipment v. United States of America, and American Dredging Company, Curtis Bay Towing Company of Pennsylvania (Claimant-Respondent)
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 29, 1968No. 16513_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
390 F.2d 125
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY
v.
CURTIS BAY TOWING COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA and TUGBOAT J. H. DEINLEIN, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel and Equipment
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, and American Dredging Company, Curtis Bay Towing Company of Pennsylvania (Claimant-Respondent), Appellant.
Margaret C. WALLING, Ritner E. Walling and Richard C. Walling, Co-Partners trading as Oliver Transportation Company
v.
CURTIS BAY TOWING COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA and Tugboat J. H. Deinlein, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel and Equipment
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, and American Dredging Company,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Curtis Bay Towing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968