Legal Opinion

Barton Enterprises, Inc. v. County of Ramsey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 8, 1986No. CX-86-228PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

By writ of certiorari Barton Enterprisés, Inc. seeks review of the tax court’s determination that oil tanks, used by Barton in its business of selling petroleum products, are taxable as real property. We affirm.

Barton sells asphalt cement (residual oils) and fuel oils, primarily to construction companies. The oils are stored in 11 tanks ranging in capacity from 100,000 gallons to more than 4 million gallons. All but the two smallest tanks were constructed on the business premises which Barton leases from the Port Authority of the City of St. Paul. The tanks are interconnected…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crown CoCo, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Busch v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Coop v. County of RenvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Guardian Energy, LLC, Relator v. County of WasecaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  3. Stateline Cooperative v. Iowa Property Assessment Appeal Bd., and Emmet County Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
  4. Stateline Cooperative v. Property Assessment Appeal BoardCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API