Legal Opinion
United States v. Mark Allen Shephard
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 21, 1994No. 92-30204PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT.
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
The issue in this case is whether Montana law enforcement officers who arrest probationers for violating the terms of their probation must do so in accordance with Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-1012. We hold that they must, and reverse Shephard’s conviction. 1
I
On July 7,1989, an informant told Missou-la County Sheriff Deputy Willis Hintz that Mark Allen Shephard, on probation for a state felony, was not complying with the condition of his probation that required him to attend regular meetings in Helena, Montana. He also told Hintz that Shephard…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- John Louis Lalonde v. County of Riverside, Robert Moquin, and Jason Horton, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- United States v. Charles John McCartyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hernan RAMIREZ, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.